fbpx
  • HOME
    HOME
  • OUR WORK
    OUR WORK
  • OUR BLOG
    OUR BLOG
  • SHOPPER MAGAZINE
    SHOPPER MAGAZINE
    • VOLUME 6
      VOLUME 6
    • VOLUME 7
      VOLUME 7
    • VOLUME 8
      VOLUME 8
    • VOLUME 9
      VOLUME 9
    • VOLUME 10
      VOLUME 10
    • VOLUME 11
      VOLUME 11
  • NEWSLETTERS
    NEWSLETTERS
  • SHOP WITH ME™
    SHOP WITH ME™
  • CONTACT US
    CONTACT US
  • Shop With Me™ Entry Form
    Shop With Me™ Entry Form
CONTACT INFORMATION
Level 1, Tasman Building
16-22 Anzac Ave
09 300 4666
LATEST TWEETS
avatar-twitter
goodenergi
Follow On Twitter
"Consumers use unattended retail so they can shop at their own pace. When consumers feel less pressure, they feel m… https://t.co/SEoRQoIKIt
38 days ago - goodenergi
Thirty-five percent of the Kiwis have indicated that they are more likely to visit unmanned stores or physical stor… https://t.co/IZXYbSlGuI
46 days ago - goodenergi
May the force be with you this year. Onwards and upwards we go. #Maythe4th #StarWars https://t.co/1pRE17l3Pp
52 days ago - goodenergi
Defining your business in a customer-centric way has significant benefits. Learn why you might be missing out here… https://t.co/w6Z2SExYA0
59 days ago - goodenergi
INSTAGRAM FEED
Instagram has returned invalid data.
logo
  • HOME
    HOME
  • OUR WORK
    OUR WORK
  • OUR BLOG
    OUR BLOG
  • SHOPPER MAGAZINE
    SHOPPER MAGAZINE
    • VOLUME 6
      VOLUME 6
    • VOLUME 7
      VOLUME 7
    • VOLUME 8
      VOLUME 8
    • VOLUME 9
      VOLUME 9
    • VOLUME 10
      VOLUME 10
    • VOLUME 11
      VOLUME 11
  • NEWSLETTERS
    NEWSLETTERS
  • SHOP WITH ME™
    SHOP WITH ME™
  • CONTACT US
    CONTACT US
  • Shop With Me™ Entry Form
    Shop With Me™ Entry Form
logo
logo
To Blog
Cans

Unsightly Packaging

March 16, 2018
-
FMCG Articles, Shopper Behaviour, Shopper Experiences

I’m hopeless. As a foodie and a strategic planner for a shopper marketing agency a trip to the supermarket is never quick and always full of delight. I’m one of those people that gets lost in the aisles.

I double-back. I triple-back. I rarely buy on price, although sometimes I do when I feel the need for a bargain. I love trying new things. I’m a sucker for tasty samples. And I am a seasoned professional at watching how shoppers behave.

The beauty of supermarkets is that they are so full of diverse experiences, from bountiful fruit to bready aromas, to exotic spices, to the comforting softness of squidgy toilet tissue.

One of my favourite places is the cooking oil aisle. Like many sections, it has blossomed of late with new product development. It has rapidly evolved from a few staples to a fabulous array of Masterchef delights, flavoured infusions, and layers of value.

A lot of cooking oil brands have adopted wine cues such as provenance, single sources, craft extraction processes, evocative Latin imagery and seductive tasting notes. For the pleasure of the chef at home, it has drawn more from the deli than the dairy.

For the shopper, the cooking oil shelf offers a lot, and it also asks a lot. It engages and demands that you look before you buy. It wants you to spend a few moments to think about your food and the flavours you consume. Its path to purchase arrives at a destination that promises deliciousness.

But not the other day.

Standing in front of the cooking oil aisle I looked and looked, but my ‘go-to’ olive oil, my culinary friend of several years, was missing. Disheartened, I began searching for a replacement; of which there were many that met my brief.

Then, just before I was about to substitute, I found it. My old favourite, but in totally new packaging design. It had lost its shape. Its familiar and confident identity had become something strange and flimsy looking. They had changed its choice architecture and removed its helpful matching of variants to food.

The effect was that I had nearly lost my favourite brand in plain sight.

A couple of years ago I experienced another such example. A prominent food manufacturer with a category captain brand of several decades was ringing the alarm bells.

They had been suffering a long slow decline in sales, being chipped away at by new high-value products and undercut by price fighters. Meanwhile, they had under-invested in their cash cow for several years.

In order to turn things around, they spent heavily on new packaging design and advertising to make their brand more attractive. Unfortunately, these major changes were not tested in research. Instead of creating a lift, the brand fell off the sales cliff.

My brief was to help them solve the problem and set them back on track. The first conclusion was that the reason for the long slow decline and the reason for the sharp plummet were different. The long slow decline was the result of under-investment in an active, innovating category. Their strong brand had slipped behind in terms of product innovation and brand salience. It needed re-invigorating not re-inventing.

The reason for the sharp plummet in sales was that the packaging solution created a radical change that – like my olive oil – made the brand invisible on shelf to its loyal buyers. With an effective absence on shelf, shoppers simply substituted with other comparable brands in droves. In my in-store research, I stood in front of the shelf alongside shoppers who literally could not see their preferred brand sitting right in front of them. To rub salt in the wound it emerged that the expensive new packaging design turned out to be a close copy of a similar product in a foreign market.

While there are certainly times when a major makeover is required for a brand, there is a real risk of confusing and losing existing customers with radical change. An incremental approach is often a smarter way to go. The Apple logo story is a perfect example. The original logo was completely hideous and lived a mercifully short life. At that point, it needed a revolution. But once they adopted the bitten apple symbol, a path of managed continuity has kept the market in step with the brand’s evolution over the past 40 years.

The moral of the story is that in trying to give shoppers something new with your brand development, be careful with what you take away.

Tags
FMCG ArticlesLew Bentley
PREVIOUS POST
Rise of the DIFM christmas
NEXT POST
Creating the ultimate scroll-stopper
Newsletters
  • Energi November 2019 Newsletter
  • Energi October 2019 Newsletter
  • Energi September 2019 Newsletter

Related News

Other posts that you should not miss
FacebookChange

Facebook makes more… C-C-C-Changes

April 30, 2018
Q&A with Mel Lee – Strategic Director @ Backchat Media Facebook threw us all a curveball at the beginning of this
Read More →
Culture, Shopper Experiences, Shopper Technology, Shopper Vol 6
4 MIN READ
Displeased,Customer,Doing,A,Thumbs,Down,Review,On,Shopping,Experience.

How Deep in Experience Debt is Your Business?

July 19, 2021

Customer-centricity is quickly becoming one of the most important factors to deliver on in 2021.

Read More →
Shopper Experiences, Shopper Technology, Shopper Vol 11
5 MIN READ
StoreFuture

Shopping of today meets the future

April 18, 2019
Fast forward the last couple of decades to today, there have been many innovations that have transformed our shopping experience.  Thanks
Read More →
Shopper Experiences, Shopper Technology, Shopper Vol 9
4 MIN READ
LATEST POSTS
  • March 23, 2022
    Superpremiumisation
  • February 21, 2022
    The Shopping Experience: What makes and breaks it for the modern customer
  • January 17, 2022
    Shop with Me, and learn how to influence your customers
  • December 9, 2021
    The Great Kiwi Summer Holiday Myth
GET CONNECTED

Stay up to date with the latest news by Energi, about Energi as well as insights from the world of shopper marketing.

Facebook
Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
SIGNUP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

PROUD PARTNER OF

Copyright 2021 Energi Advertising Holdings Ltd

Unsightly Packaging | Energi Advertising